menu

Infliximab Trough Levels at Induction to Predict Treatment Failure During Maintenance

Be part of the knowledge.
Register

ReachMD is even better when
you join the community!
Registration is free and easy.

Register Now

Infliximab Trough Levels at Induction to Predict Treatment Failure During Maintenance

Infliximab Trough Levels at Induction to Predict Treatment Failure During Maintenance
RestartResume
    A detailed review of a study regarding the impact of the pharmacokinetics of IFX at induction on treatment failure.
    • Overview

      Infliximab Trough Levels at Induction to Predict Treatment Failure During Maintenance.

      Liefferinckx C1, Minsart C, Toubeau JF, Cremer A, Amininejad L, Quertinmont E, Devière J, Gils A, van Gossum A, Franchimont D.

      BACKGROUND:

      Infliximab (IFX) is indicated for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Nevertheless, loss of response (LOR) to IFX is reported in up to 10% to 30% of patients within the first year of treatment. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of the pharmacokinetics of IFX at induction on treatment failure.

      METHODS:

      This is a longitudinal cohort study on 269 patients with IBD treated with IFX in a single center. A total of 2331 blood samples were prospectively collected from 2007 until March 2015 with a retrospective analysis of clinical data. IFX trough levels (TLs) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Antibodies to IFX were measured by drug-sensitive bridging assay.

      RESULTS:

      During follow-up, patients were defined according to treatment outcome. At week 6, median IFX TL in patients requiring a switch to another treatment due to LOR (LOR switched group) (2.32 μg/mL [0.12-19.93 μg/mL]) was lower than in patients with long-term response (long-term responders) (8.66 μg/mL [0.12-12.09 μg/mL], P = 0.007) and in patients responding to optimization (LOR optimized group) (7.28 μg/mL [0.17-14.91 μg/mL], P = 0.021). At week 2, median IFX TL was lower in the LOR switched group (5.7 μg/mL [0.15-12.09 μg/mL]) compared with the long-term responders (11.92 μg/mL [0.14-19.93 μg/mL], P = 0.041) but no significant difference was reached with the LOR optimized group (11.91 μg/mL [0.23-12.09 μg/mL], P = 0.065). In the LOR switched group, median IFX TL at induction (weeks 2 and 6) was significantly lower when patients had been previously exposed to anti-tumor necrosis factor compared with naive patients (0.91 μg/mL [0.12-4.4 μg/mL] versus 6.6 μg/mL [0.15-19.93 μg/mL], P = 0.044).

      CONCLUSIONS:

      This study suggests that patients who do not respond to any optimization strategy have lower IFX TLs during induction at week 6. IFX TLs measured early on at induction might predict treatment failure to IFX during maintenance.

       

    Facebook Comments

    You must be in to display playlists.

    Get a Dose of ReachMD in Your Inbox
    and Practice Smarter Medicine

    Stay current with the best in medical education.